cryptonews.net
Polymarket has received official notice that a government investigation, which began years ago, into its operations, is closed. The ruling is the end of a legal investigation that started after an outcry over Polymarket in terms of bets on elections concerning the 2024 American presidential race.
According to WuBlockchain on X, both agencies confirmed in early February to the platform that no additional enforcement would be taken. The notice closes a couple of years of legal grey in the book when Polymarket was placed in the center of controversy in relation to the regulation of political betting and decentralized finance.
Polymarket has gained the attention of regulators, because it required customers to place prediction market bets on political events, such as a bet on the winner of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Through these markets, users could purchase and sell shares based on binary outcomes, e.g. Will Donald Trump win the presidency? in the USDC stablecoin on the Polygon blockchain.
The fast spread of the platform and its open-access format caused a concern among the regulators that it did not follow the U.S. law set to regulate the commodities and betting. Although it was decentralized in implementation, the platform was run through Blockratize, Inc., a New York-based company, the main employees of which worked on the interface and the backend infrastructure. The regulators in the U.S. are now interpreting these markets as event-driven derivatives, and as such they usually fall under the regulation of CFTC.
The scandal grew after the 2024 election cycle that was marred with a lot of controversy, with Polymarket allegedly having facilitated many such political bets that measured in millions of dollars. The same sources confirmed that the exercise had bipartisan attention with some of those in the legislature considering the act a possible conduit to manipulate the market or to spread misinformation particularly against claims which had traction in the web that the election was manipulated.
FBI Raid Targeted Founder in Wake of 2024 Vote
The federal law enforcement increased its efforts in the investigation shortly after the election results in 2024 were certified. Early in December 2024, as part of the investigation, FBI agents raided the home of Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan. The report said that the raid targeted informational materials and communications connected to the election markets.
Neither the FBI nor the DOJ made any public release regarding the raid. But sources familiar with the situation said federal officials also were looking into whether the platform had infringed the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) that regulates futures and options trading in the United States.
Polymarket has already been enforced by the CFTC. In January 2022, the agency fined the platform a $1.4 million penalty and demanded that it shut down some of the non-compliant markets. Such a move, without criminal charges, augured future regulatory intensification of decentralized prediction markets.
By issuing their recent reports with the press, the DOJ and CFTC seem to have closed its cases without accusing or proposing new penalties. An individual acquainted with the messages added that both letters said that the investigations had been concluded, and no additional enforcement or lawsuit was coming.
This is impressive because of the gravity of the issues expressed by regulators and the stature of the platform. Legal experts observe that in many cases, such inquiries may grow to both official civil and criminal proceedings, particularly when police officials engage in raids of founders and company offices. The fact that no further action was taken implies that the agencies could find no enough investigation to continue prosecution of the federal law violation.
Broader Implications for Decentralized Prediction Markets
The most sophisticated point of the investigation might not spell the last on regulatory admiration of blockchain-based betting networks. The computer model of Polymarket, in which users establish markets that forecast situations and resolve them according to third-party data, has triggered continuing debate among regulators as to the point at which a legally permissible information market becomes a form of gamble or unlicensed derivatives trading.
Interestingly the CFTC which is the regulator of the derivatives and commodities markets in the U.S., had earlier stated that event contracts related to non-financial outcomes had to be registered or exempt by the law. Polymarket (In the case of Polymarket), the agency considered certain of its former offerings to have constituted a so-called binary options contract that had to be cleared by a designated contract market (DCM) or swap execution facility (SEF).
Polymarket has made multiple operational changes since its initial enforcement action in 2022, as it now geofences American users and redesigned the interface so that high-risk event markets are not easy to reach. All this probably contributed to the reason why regulators decided to end their investigations without any additional misconduct.
Increased Scrutiny Across the Sector
The legal battle surrounding Polymarket has revealed a more broad theme when it comes to the enforcement of U.S. regulations involving decentralized platforms. With the growth in prominence of prediction markets, especially in high stakes political events, the agencies assigned the responsibility of curbing unregistered trading, as well as ensuring that consumers are not defrauded through market manipulation have started taking inspection actions.
Other prediction markets have however taken formal regulatory routes to offer contracts on political and other events (like Kalshi, currently operating under CFTC). Decentralised platforms, in contrast, frequently do not register in the U.S. by making such platforms inaccessible or by involving offshore intermediaries. This structural divergence has resulted in a disparate legal climate which has led to demands of greater simplicity in the rules that will guide event based financial products.
The case of Polymarket underlines the dilemmas presented by the application of legacy laws to blockchain protocols that challenge the boundaries of the fields of finance, entertainment, and information sharing. Although this investigation by the DOJ and CFTC has now been concluded, the larger issues of decentralized prediction markets are still up in the air.
Platform Continues to Operate, Focuses on International Growth
Polymarket has maneuvered around the inquiries by the regulators, remaining open in the international market, where it kept several lucrative marketplaces on different issues, including cryptocurrency breakthroughs, geopolitical politics, and pop culture. On-chain analytics platforms have been recording the activity of the user base on the site, where there are volumes of trading in millions of dollars in recent months.
The firm has also stressed the arrangements of affiliations such as the usage of oracles to solve the market and user vetting processes. The U.S. user will not be able to join the real-money markets, however access to information regarding market forecasts will be accessible to the rest of the world.
As per the publicly available data, the current Polymarket runs on the Polygon network, with market resolution records availed by the UMA optimistic oracle framework. This serves to guarantee market outcomes rely on publicly verifiable information without allowing the decentralized governance decision making to determine resolution of disputes.